Off-ramp summary, STRT T casefile:

• STRT T off-ramps consistently to centralised exchanges, Coinbase, Kraken, and Gemini appear less often than the offshore venues; the casefile names the actual endpoint.
• The STRT T off-ramp address is matched to known compliance feeds, the Professor’s standing dataset plus chain-analytics references.
• Compliance leverage is applied at the named counterparty for STRT T, the packet meets the off-ramp’s published compliance standard.
• When the STRT T off-ramp does not respond, escalation runs through IC3 (for US claimants), state AG, and (above a dollar threshold) civil-discovery overlay.

The Professor’s recovery note for STRT T:

1. Read the STRT T submission, written go/no-go returned.
2. Map the STRT T wallet trail, every hop captured with chain of custody hashes.
3. Name the STRT T off-ramp, endpoint counterparty identified.
4. Build and file the STRT T recovery packet, to IC3, state AG, off-ramp compliance, civil-discovery overlay.
5. Stay on the STRT T file, until written next steps exist.

What we read in a STRT T casefile:

• Chains in scope for STRT T, the chains that handle the volume of casefile activity in this segment (BTC, ETH, Tron, BSC, plus L2s).
• Off-ramps in scope for STRT T, named centralised exchanges with compliance leverage.
• Filings supported on STRT T, IC3, state AG, off-ramp desk, civil discovery as applicable.

Boundaries on every STRT T casefile, never crossed:

• Recovery scammers do these things on STRT T; the Professor never does, request seed phrases.
• Recovery scammers do these things on STRT T; the Professor never does, request remote logins.
• Recovery scammers do these things on STRT T; the Professor never does, demand upfront cash.
• Recovery scammers do these things on STRT T; the Professor never does, guarantee a recovery.
• Recovery scammers do these things on STRT T; the Professor never does, call you unsolicited.