Reading the wallets, LS Markets casefile:

• Deposit-side hashes from claimant wallets into LS Markets’s receiving addresses.
• Operator forwarding wallets, deposit consolidation documented to chain of custody standards.
• Inter-chain bridge transactions when value moves toward off-ramp liquidity.
• Mixer/obfuscation events the operator routed through, where present.
• Final off-ramp endpoint and named counterparty exchange.

Off-ramp map, where the funds left the chain:

• Off-ramp endpoint for LS Markets resolves to a named centralised counterparty, the venue varies casefile to casefile, but the resolution always names a real exchange wallet.
• LS Markets’s off-ramp address is matched against the Professor’s compliance feed and against external chain-analytics datasets.
• The compliance packet for LS Markets is structured the way an off-ramp compliance reviewer expects to receive evidence, header, hashes, narrative, ask.
• If the LS Markets off-ramp counterparty does not respond inside the published window, escalation routes through IC3, state AG, and civil discovery.

Recovery sequence, from on-chain reading to filed packet:

1. Casefile review on LS Markets, reading the submission against the no-go list.
2. Trace mapping on LS Markets, pathway documented to chain of custody standard.
3. Off-ramp naming on LS Markets, exchange endpoint identified.
4. Packet filing on LS Markets, to the named off-ramp, IC3, state AG; civil discovery overlay as applicable.
5. Documented follow-through on LS Markets.

Boundaries on every LS Markets casefile, never crossed:

• On the LS Markets casefile, never request a seed phrase. Ever.
• On the LS Markets casefile, never request remote-access logins to a wallet or exchange.
• On the LS Markets casefile, never demand an upfront cash retainer to scope the matter.
• On the LS Markets casefile, never promise a guaranteed recovery. The trail does not promise one.
• On the LS Markets casefile, never call the claimant unsolicited. Written-only.