Off-ramp map, where the funds left the chain:

• Off-ramp endpoint for Kryptovest resolves to a named centralised counterparty, the venue varies casefile to casefile, but the resolution always names a real exchange wallet.
• Kryptovest’s off-ramp address is matched against the Professor’s compliance feed and against external chain-analytics datasets.
• The compliance packet for Kryptovest is structured the way an off-ramp compliance reviewer expects to receive evidence, header, hashes, narrative, ask.
• If the Kryptovest off-ramp counterparty does not respond inside the published window, escalation routes through IC3, state AG, and civil discovery.

How a Kryptovest casefile becomes a evidence filing:

1. First read on Kryptovest, incoming submission is reviewed against the no-go list and a written go/no-go is returned in writing.
2. Wallet trace on Kryptovest, deposit-to-off-ramp pathway is mapped across chains with verifiable hashes.
3. Counterparty identification, the off-ramp endpoint for Kryptovest is named to a centralised exchange wallet.
4. Packet filing on Kryptovest, IC3, state AG, off-ramp compliance desk; civil discovery if dollar value justifies it.
5. Casefile follow-through, the Professor stays with Kryptovest until a documented outcome or escalation step is on file.

Reading-list, chains and exchanges in scope:

• Chains the Professor reads for Kryptovest casefiles, BTC, ETH, Tron USDT, BNB Smart Chain, Avalanche, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, plus the cross-chain bridges that link them.
• Off-ramps named in Kryptovest, major centralised venues with compliance desks that accept regulator-grade packets.
• Filing pathways available on Kryptovest, IC3 for US claimants, state AG offices, off-ramp compliance, and civil-discovery overlay for high-value loss.