From the marginalia, the deposit pathway:

• Claimant-to-platform deposit transactions on the deposit chain used by GT Trading.
• Operator-controlled forwarding wallets where deposits consolidate ahead of laundering or off-ramping.
• Cross-chain bridge events to chains with deeper exchange liquidity.
• Privacy-service interactions, where present in the trail.
• Off-ramp wallet, the named centralised-exchange endpoint.

Off-ramp summary, GT Trading casefile:

• Off-ramp endpoint for GT Trading resolves to a named centralised counterparty, the venue varies casefile to casefile, but the resolution always names a real exchange wallet.
• GT Trading’s off-ramp address is matched against the Professor’s compliance feed and against external chain-analytics datasets.
• The compliance packet for GT Trading is structured the way an off-ramp compliance reviewer expects to receive evidence, header, hashes, narrative, ask.
• If the GT Trading off-ramp counterparty does not respond inside the published window, escalation routes through IC3, state AG, and civil discovery.

Recovery sequence, from on-chain reading to filed packet:

1. Casefile review on GT Trading, reading the submission against the no-go list.
2. Trace mapping on GT Trading, pathway documented to chain of custody standard.
3. Off-ramp naming on GT Trading, exchange endpoint identified.
4. Packet filing on GT Trading, to the named off-ramp, IC3, state AG; civil discovery overlay as applicable.
5. Documented follow-through on GT Trading.

Lines the Professor will not cross:

• GT Trading policy, seed phrases are never requested.
• GT Trading policy, remote-access logins are never requested.
• GT Trading policy, no upfront cash retainer to scope.
• GT Trading policy, no guaranteed-recovery language. None.
• GT Trading policy, no unsolicited calls. The Professor responds in writing only.