From the marginalia, the deposit pathway:

• Claimant deposit hashes, provided in the case submission and verified against the public ledger for Dowmarkets.
• Forwarding wallets on the deposit chain, each hop documented with the forwarding tx hash and the consolidating wallet.
• Bridge events into chains where the operator can off-ramp at scale.
• Mixer or privacy-service interactions, where present, listed with the contract address and the deposit/withdraw side.
• Off-ramp endpoint, the centralised exchange deposit address holding the compliance lever.

Off-ramp summary, Dowmarkets casefile:

• Off-ramp endpoint for Dowmarkets resolves to a named centralised counterparty, the venue varies casefile to casefile, but the resolution always names a real exchange wallet.
• Dowmarkets’s off-ramp address is matched against the Professor’s compliance feed and against external chain-analytics datasets.
• The compliance packet for Dowmarkets is structured the way an off-ramp compliance reviewer expects to receive evidence, header, hashes, narrative, ask.
• If the Dowmarkets off-ramp counterparty does not respond inside the published window, escalation routes through IC3, state AG, and civil discovery.

Recovery pathway, how this casefile moves toward filing:

1. Submission triage, Dowmarkets casefile reviewed against the no-go list, written reply within one business day.
2. Pathway trace, Dowmarkets deposit and forwarding wallets captured.
3. Endpoint identification, Dowmarkets off-ramp wallet named.
4. Filing, Dowmarkets packet delivered to IC3, state AG, off-ramp compliance, civil discovery as needed.
5. Ongoing follow, Dowmarkets stays on file until a documented next step is reached.

Recovery scammers do these things; the Professor never does:

• Hard line on Dowmarkets, no seed-phrase requests, period.
• Hard line on Dowmarkets, no remote logins requested.
• Hard line on Dowmarkets, no upfront cash retainer.
• Hard line on Dowmarkets, no guarantee language.
• Hard line on Dowmarkets, no unsolicited phone outreach.