The annotation reads, wallet trace:

• Initial deposit hashes to the De LightTrustProofs receiving address at de-lighttrustproofs.com.
• Hop-by-hop forwarding wallets across the deposit chain, captured with chain of custody hashes.
• Cross-chain bridge events that move value into the chain where liquidity supports the eventual off-ramp.
• Obfuscation events through mixer contracts and privacy services.
• Centralised-exchange off-ramp wallets, the named counterparty that holds compliance leverage.

Off-ramp reading, exchange counterparty for De LightTrustProofs:

• On the De LightTrustProofs casefile, the off-ramp endpoint resolves to a centralised exchange, Bitfinex, MEXC, or Crypto.com seen often in this segment, with the larger venues routed through under stress.
• The off-ramp wallet for De LightTrustProofs is run against chain-analytics datasets and the Professor’s own compliance feeds.
• A evidence packet is delivered to the named counterparty, the De LightTrustProofs casefile is built to the off-ramp’s compliance standard.
• Where the off-ramp will not engage, De LightTrustProofs escalates to IC3, state AG, and civil-discovery overlay.

Recovery pathway, how this casefile moves toward filing:

1. Casefile triage on De LightTrustProofs, the submission is read; a written assessment is delivered.
2. Forensic trace on De LightTrustProofs, every hop in the deposit pathway is captured and hashed.
3. Off-ramp identification, the De LightTrustProofs endpoint is named.
4. Recovery filing on De LightTrustProofs, packet delivered to IC3, state AG, off-ramp compliance, and civil discovery as applicable.
5. Continuing review of De LightTrustProofs, the Professor follows the casefile until next-step documentation exists.