The annotation continues, off-ramp endpoint:

• On the Cryptics casefile, the off-ramp endpoint resolves to a centralised exchange, Bitfinex, MEXC, or Crypto.com seen often in this segment, with the larger venues routed through under stress.
• The off-ramp wallet for Cryptics is run against chain-analytics datasets and the Professor’s own compliance feeds.
• A evidence packet is delivered to the named counterparty, the Cryptics casefile is built to the off-ramp’s compliance standard.
• Where the off-ramp will not engage, Cryptics escalates to IC3, state AG, and civil-discovery overlay.

Recovery sequence, from on-chain reading to filed packet:

1. Casefile triage on Cryptics, the submission is read; a written assessment is delivered.
2. Forensic trace on Cryptics, every hop in the deposit pathway is captured and hashed.
3. Off-ramp identification, the Cryptics endpoint is named.
4. Recovery filing on Cryptics, packet delivered to IC3, state AG, off-ramp compliance, and civil discovery as applicable.
5. Continuing review of Cryptics, the Professor follows the casefile until next-step documentation exists.

Recovery scammers do these things; the Professor never does:

• What the Professor will not do on Cryptics, ask for a seed phrase.
• What the Professor will not do on Cryptics, request remote-access logins.
• What the Professor will not do on Cryptics, demand cash up front.
• What the Professor will not do on Cryptics, promise a guarantee.
• What the Professor will not do on Cryptics, call you out of the blue.