From the marginalia, the deposit pathway:

• Initial deposit hashes to the Plus100 receiving address at plus100fx.com.
• Hop-by-hop forwarding wallets across the deposit chain, captured with chain of custody hashes.
• Cross-chain bridge events that move value into the chain where liquidity supports the eventual off-ramp.
• Obfuscation events through mixer contracts and privacy services.
• Centralised-exchange off-ramp wallets, the named counterparty that holds compliance leverage.

Off-ramp summary, Plus100 casefile:

• Off-ramp endpoint for Plus100 resolves to a named centralised counterparty, the venue varies casefile to casefile, but the resolution always names a real exchange wallet.
• Plus100’s off-ramp address is matched against the Professor’s compliance feed and against external chain-analytics datasets.
• The compliance packet for Plus100 is structured the way an off-ramp compliance reviewer expects to receive evidence, header, hashes, narrative, ask.
• If the Plus100 off-ramp counterparty does not respond inside the published window, escalation routes through IC3, state AG, and civil discovery.

The Professor’s recovery note for Plus100:

1. Casefile review on Plus100, reading the submission against the no-go list.
2. Trace mapping on Plus100, pathway documented to chain of custody standard.
3. Off-ramp naming on Plus100, exchange endpoint identified.
4. Packet filing on Plus100, to the named off-ramp, IC3, state AG; civil discovery overlay as applicable.
5. Documented follow-through on Plus100.

Lines the Professor will not cross:

• On the Plus100 casefile, never request a seed phrase. Ever.
• On the Plus100 casefile, never request remote-access logins to a wallet or exchange.
• On the Plus100 casefile, never demand an upfront cash retainer to scope the matter.
• On the Plus100 casefile, never promise a guaranteed recovery. The trail does not promise one.
• On the Plus100 casefile, never call the claimant unsolicited. Written-only.