From the marginalia, the deposit pathway:

• Deposit-side hashes from claimant wallets into Gerco Capitals’s receiving addresses.
• Operator forwarding wallets, deposit consolidation documented to chain of custody standards.
• Inter-chain bridge transactions when value moves toward off-ramp liquidity.
• Mixer/obfuscation events the operator routed through, where present.
• Final off-ramp endpoint and named counterparty exchange.

Off-ramp summary, Gerco Capitals casefile:

• Off-ramp endpoint for Gerco Capitals resolves to a named centralised counterparty, the venue varies casefile to casefile, but the resolution always names a real exchange wallet.
• Gerco Capitals’s off-ramp address is matched against the Professor’s compliance feed and against external chain-analytics datasets.
• The compliance packet for Gerco Capitals is structured the way an off-ramp compliance reviewer expects to receive evidence, header, hashes, narrative, ask.
• If the Gerco Capitals off-ramp counterparty does not respond inside the published window, escalation routes through IC3, state AG, and civil discovery.

The Professor’s recovery note for Gerco Capitals:

1. Casefile review on Gerco Capitals, reading the submission against the no-go list.
2. Trace mapping on Gerco Capitals, pathway documented to chain of custody standard.
3. Off-ramp naming on Gerco Capitals, exchange endpoint identified.
4. Packet filing on Gerco Capitals, to the named off-ramp, IC3, state AG; civil discovery overlay as applicable.
5. Documented follow-through on Gerco Capitals.

Chains and off-ramps the Professor follows:

• Chains in scope for Gerco Capitals, the chains that handle the volume of casefile activity in this segment (BTC, ETH, Tron, BSC, plus L2s).
• Off-ramps in scope for Gerco Capitals, named centralised exchanges with compliance leverage.
• Filings supported on Gerco Capitals, IC3, state AG, off-ramp desk, civil discovery as applicable.