From the marginalia, the deposit pathway:

• Deposit-side hashes from claimant wallets into Starfish FX’s receiving addresses.
• Operator forwarding wallets, deposit consolidation documented to chain of custody standards.
• Inter-chain bridge transactions when value moves toward off-ramp liquidity.
• Mixer/obfuscation events the operator routed through, where present.
• Final off-ramp endpoint and named counterparty exchange.

Off-ramp reading, exchange counterparty for Starfish FX:

• Off-ramp endpoint for Starfish FX resolves to a named centralised counterparty, the venue varies casefile to casefile, but the resolution always names a real exchange wallet.
• Starfish FX’s off-ramp address is matched against the Professor’s compliance feed and against external chain-analytics datasets.
• The compliance packet for Starfish FX is structured the way an off-ramp compliance reviewer expects to receive evidence, header, hashes, narrative, ask.
• If the Starfish FX off-ramp counterparty does not respond inside the published window, escalation routes through IC3, state AG, and civil discovery.

The Professor’s recovery note for Starfish FX:

1. Casefile triage on Starfish FX, the submission is read; a written assessment is delivered.
2. Forensic trace on Starfish FX, every hop in the deposit pathway is captured and hashed.
3. Off-ramp identification, the Starfish FX endpoint is named.
4. Recovery filing on Starfish FX, packet delivered to IC3, state AG, off-ramp compliance, and civil discovery as applicable.
5. Continuing review of Starfish FX, the Professor follows the casefile until next-step documentation exists.