The annotation continues, off-ramp endpoint:

• Off-ramp endpoint for Alchemay resolves to a named centralised counterparty, the venue varies casefile to casefile, but the resolution always names a real exchange wallet.
• Alchemay’s off-ramp address is matched against the Professor’s compliance feed and against external chain-analytics datasets.
• The compliance packet for Alchemay is structured the way an off-ramp compliance reviewer expects to receive evidence, header, hashes, narrative, ask.
• If the Alchemay off-ramp counterparty does not respond inside the published window, escalation routes through IC3, state AG, and civil discovery.

How a Alchemay casefile becomes a evidence filing:

1. Casefile review on Alchemay, reading the submission against the no-go list.
2. Trace mapping on Alchemay, pathway documented to chain of custody standard.
3. Off-ramp naming on Alchemay, exchange endpoint identified.
4. Packet filing on Alchemay, to the named off-ramp, IC3, state AG; civil discovery overlay as applicable.
5. Documented follow-through on Alchemay.

Reading-list, chains and exchanges in scope:

• Chains the Alchemay casefile may touch, Bitcoin and Ethereum at the deposit side, Tron USDT-TRC20 in stablecoin pathways, BNB Smart Chain and the L2s (Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Base) where bridges link them.
• Off-ramps relevant to Alchemay, the major venues including OKX, Bybit, Binance and KuCoin, plus the regional venues operators rotate through under regulatory stress.
• Filings the Alchemay packet supports, IC3, the appropriate state attorney general, the off-ramp’s compliance desk, and a civil-discovery overlay where dollar value justifies it.

Recovery scammers do these things; the Professor never does:

• Alchemay policy, seed phrases are never requested.
• Alchemay policy, remote-access logins are never requested.
• Alchemay policy, no upfront cash retainer to scope.
• Alchemay policy, no guaranteed-recovery language. None.
• Alchemay policy, no unsolicited calls. The Professor responds in writing only.